Message
Yes, I agree with Mike` comments about the painting. The main problem of the signature of Tang Yin is a fake signature. It has no the power as what Tang Yin did, on the other hand, the signature of Tang Yin looks like to written in the later periord because the colors of the ink looks very new which should have been as same as the colour of the Wu Jun. Since the years have been passed, the ink colour should be absorbed by the rice paper or the silk.
Meanwhile, the style of the calligraphy of Wu Jun is quite different from the style of the calligraphy of Tang Yin. I have to say that the style of the calligraphy of Wu Jun and the skill is much better than the skill of the signature of Tang Yin.
It seems that the painting is the old painting, but it`s done by some unkonwn artist who copied Tang Yin`s artwork, who lived in the same periord or later, but someone who lived in later date put the fake signature. Such kind of story used to be happened in the end of Qing Dynasty.
Hope my comments would be positive.
Note that we are now reviewing postings before posting due to the large volume of SPAM and inappropriate postings on the forum. The validation process may take up to 12 hours. |
|