Asianart.com | Associations | Articles | Exhibitions | Galleries |
Visitors' Forum |
Message Listing by Date: |
|
Message Index |
Back |
Post a New Message
| Search | Private Mail
| FAQ
|
Subject:help with mark, age identification, please
Posted By: Daniel Sat, Sep 17, 2016 IP: 90.212.20.11 I own this nice, I guess ginger jar. It's about 9 inches high, satsuma I think, gilded, textured. Surface has fine crazing, so I assume it's not very modern, anything between 60-120 years?. I've tried to identify mark underneath, but it's not easy. So, nothing about maker or provenience, nor age. Anyone can help, please? |
Subject:Re: help with mark, age identification, please
Posted By: mario stefano cirio Sun, Oct 23, 2016 The mark is: Ming Zhi - 明志 - Akira Kokorozashi |
Subject:Re: help with mark, age identification, please
Posted By: Neil Thu, Nov 17, 2016 I have 2 vases and 2 bowls with the same marking as the vase above. What period do you think they are, and what value? |
Subject:Re: help with mark, age identification, please
Posted By: mario stefano cirio Sat, Nov 19, 2016 I think they are Taisho period or early Showa. So 1912 - 1935. They are beautiful. The two couple can be valued more o less 500-600 $. |
Subject:Re: help with mark, age identification, please
Posted By: Neil Tue, Nov 22, 2016 Hi Mario, |
Subject:Re: help with mark, age identification, please
Posted By: mario stefano cirio Tue, Nov 22, 2016 I have no other information about the maker. I think it's not Meiji but probably Taisho. This opinion is due to quality of colors, reliefs, gold decorations and care of details. In other words an intuitive valuation. |
Subject:Re: help with mark, age identification, please
Posted By: phoebe Tue, Oct 10, 2017 hello Mario, |
Subject:Re: help with mark, age identification, please
Posted By: mario stefano cirio Wed, Oct 11, 2017 Dear Phoebe, |
Subject:Re: help with mark, age identification, please
Posted By: Martin Michels Thu, Oct 12, 2017 I do not agree with the name Akira Kokorozashi 明志, the 2nd character is just not correct, by NO means it says 志, but more likely 抬 which makes it someting like Meitai in Japanese. I agree with Bokaba, who's saying by a similar posting of this mark: Chinese copies of Japanese Satsuma. |
Asianart.com | Associations | Articles | Exhibitions | Galleries | |