Asianart.com | Associations | Articles | Exhibitions | Galleries |
Visitors' Forum |
| Message Listing by Date: |
|
|
Message Index |
Back |
Post a New Message
| Search | Private Mail
| FAQ
|
|
|
Subject:Imari bowl
Posted By: primroy@earthlink.net Wed, Jan 30, 2008 IP: 66.32.26.170 Dear Friends, |
|
|
Subject:Re: Imari bowl
Posted By: Primroy Thu, Jan 31, 2008 More photos for your review. |
|
|
Subject:Re: Imari bowl
Posted By: Greg Thu, Jan 31, 2008 Mark reads: Da Ming Chenghua Nian Zhi, this is a common mark found on Imari / Arita porcelain. The mark is not an indication of age. Dating Imari is not my thing, but, I would put this in the 20th c., Greg |
|
|
Subject:Re: Imari bowl
Posted By: Primroy Fri, Feb 01, 2008 Thanks Greg for the translation. I would like to add that the gold on the rim has wear. |
|
|
Subject:Re: Imari bowl
Posted By: Primroy Sun, Feb 17, 2008 I received this bowl and it looks brand new. The bowl was misrepresented as being older than it was. There was no wear on the rim as seller described. |
|
|
Subject:Re: Imari bowl
Posted By: Arjan Tue, Feb 19, 2008 Are you sure the blue paint is stenciled? The mark and the rimlines looks handpainted to me (as far as I can see on the pictures). The part in the middle (inside) is a little far but lookes also okay fom this distance. I don't know what you mean with "brandnew" but if one of the experts here told me it is of Taisho periode I wouldn't have a problem with that. I also think it has a starcrack on the bottom (near the Chen-mark)so "brandnew" ..... I don't think so. |
|
|
Subject:Re: Imari bowl
Posted By: Greg Tue, Feb 19, 2008 I don't think this bowl is brand new either, granted I am not seeing wear on the decoration, but it does appear there is some foot wear, I still believe this is 20th c. but not "brand new"....Greg |
|
|
Subject:Re: Imari bowl
Posted By: Primroy Tue, Feb 19, 2008 Thanks for your astute observations. There is indeed a star crack on the bottom that I had not noticed. What would have caused such a crack? I believe you are correct about the hand painting, but I thought things were hand painted even today to resemble older pieces. A quarter inch of the rim is without glaze right where the beveled edge starts. The unglazed porcelain looks spotted. |
Asianart.com | Associations | Articles | Exhibitions | Galleries | |